This is a pilot challenge to find creative space architecture representations and system decomposition using SysML elements for a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) library. NASA mission architects need a library of SysML elements for common physical and functional elements that is consistent across NASA. This will be a prize contest open to individuals as well as university students to create a habitat-related architecture library of model elements. 

 

Objectives: -Decompose habitat physical and functional architecture in a model, organized as a library of elements, rather than as a habitat design project Create elements that contain all the required attributes in a way that allows easy analysis of an architecture made of these elements through roll-up analysis or parametric diagrams -Create elements use graphics that communicate the element easily in relatively small file size -Create many elements for the library, especially those that can be used in other types of projects Background: Mission architects mostly start from scratch to build model elements representing the functional and physical architecture of a system in SysML. There are a few beginning libraries, but these are also local to a program or group. A common library will save system engineers a large amount of time, will allow project stakeholders to recognize common graphics and quickly understand the architecture options. 

 

Correction: The reward amount is $8K in total. NASA will retain the rights to the materials generated from the winners, but the submitters have the right to create derivative works and/or use as a part of their portfolio. 

 

Prize Structure: (MBSE to review prize amounts) -$5k for Highest Quality – form, style, ease of use, how well does it define the problem, what are graphical elements -$3K for Highest Quantity – function, depth and detail of the model.

 

Goals & Judging Criteria: Create a library of blocks of a subsystem or all of the habitat physical architecture and elements to represent the functions that support functional decomposition. 

-Clear library organization/navigation 

-Consistent definition of element attributes (that will support roll-ups, Technical Performance Measure (TPM) analysis) 

-Ability to create functional architecture and Concept of Operations flows (examples are valued) 

-Ability to easily link and display functions the physical elements will perform (examples are valued) -Number of total library elements Required: 

-Preferred delivery in a MagicDraw model, organized in packages, but open to other tools 

-“Table of contents” or dashboard for easy navigation of library (e.g. content or package diagram, or your own GUI) 

-Physical element attributes (where appropriate): owner(actor), mass, power, cost, 

-Optional attributes: Technology Readiness Level (TRL), heritage, source, reliability, pressure, temperature